Business ProfileforCryptoFX, LLC
Current Alerts For This Business
The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the government’s allegations, which have not yet been proven.
Litigation Release No. 25547 / October 3, 2022
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mauricio Chavez, et al., No. 4:22-cv-03359 (S.D. Tex. filed September 19, 2022)
On September 19, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency action to stop an on-going fraudulent and unregistered crypto asset offering targeting Latino investors, run by defendants Mauricio Chavez and Giorgio Benvenuto through a company Chavez founded and controlled, CryptoFX, LLC. At the SEC's request, the Court issued a temporary restraining order halting the offering, as well as temporary orders freezing assets and granting other emergency relief. After a hearing on September 29, 2022, the Court also granted the SEC's motion for a receiver and extended the asset freeze.
The SEC's complaint alleges that, in 2020, Chavez began holding paid classes for the ostensible purpose of educating and empowering the Latino community to build wealth through crypto asset trading. However, the complaint alleges Chavez had no background, education, or training in investments or crypto assets. According to the complaint, the seminars were merely conduits for soliciting investors to give their money to CryptoFX, which Chavez would then supposedly use to conduct crypto asset and foreign exchange trading. As alleged, Chavez claimed, among other things, to have earned outsized returns from crypto trading and to have "literally made over 5 millionaires in the last year." He also provided investors false documents that, among other things, grossly overstated his crypto experience and guaranteed that investors would not bear any losses. The defendants ultimately raised over $12 million from more than 5,000 investors.
The SEC alleges that Chavez was actually running a Ponzi scheme; rather than use investor funds for crypto trading, Chavez used more than 90% of investor funds to pay fake returns to investors, support his lifestyle, and purchase and develop real estate that he and Benvenuto controlled. For his part, Benvenuto allegedly solicited a large investor into the scheme and diverted investor funds to himself and a company that he and Chavez owned, CBT Group, LLC. In total, the SEC alleges that Chavez and Benvenuto made approximately $2.7 million in Ponzi payments while diverting almost $8 million for their own use, including nearly $1.5 million that Chavez spent on cars, credit card payments, jewelry, adult entertainment, and a house in his wife's name.
The Commission's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, charges Chavez, Benvenuto, and CryptoFX with violating, or aiding and abetting violations of, the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint also charges Chavez with violating Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Chavez and CryptoFX of violating the securities registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest against each defendant, as well as bars against Chavez and Benvenuto from serving as officers or directors of any public company. The complaint names CBT Group as a relief defendant and seeks disgorgement of its ill-gotten gains along with prejudgment interest.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jillian Harris and Carol Hahn of the SEC's Fort Worth Regional Office, under the supervision of Jim Etri and Eric Werner. The SEC's litigation will be led by Matthew J. Gulde and supervised by B. David Fraser.
Additional business information
DESIST AND REFRAIN ORDER
(For violations of sections 25110 and 25401 of the Corporations Code)
The Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation (Commissioner) finds that:
1. At all relevant times, CryptoFX LLC, also known as CryptoFX Academy,
CryptoFX Learning Academy, CFX Lifestyle Academy, CFX Academy, and CFX (CryptoFX) is
and was a Texas limited liability company that maintained business addresses at 9900 Spectrum
Drive, Austin, Texas 78717 and 800 Town and Country Blvd., Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77024.
CryptoFX operated the websites www.cryptofxla.com and www.cryptofxlearningacademy.com.
CryptoFX advertised its businesses on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
2. Through its promoters, CryptoFX targeted the Latino community. CryptoFX and its
promoters collected investors’ monies and purported to invest their monies in crypto assets.
CryptoFX also purported to provide educational classes to empower the Latino community to build wealth through crypto asset trading.
3. At all relevant times, Mauricio Chavez (Chavez) is and was the Chief Executive
Officer and founder of CryptoFX.
4. At all relevant times, Hector Aquino, also known as Hector Angeles Aquino Sr.
(Aquino), is and was a promoter of CryptoFX. Aquino controlled and induced or provided
substantial assistance to CryptoFX within the meaning of Corporations Code section 25403,
subdivisions (a) and (b), in violating the above cited laws.
5. At all relevant times, Claudia Velazquez, also known as Claudia Hernandez
Velazquez and Claudia Velazquez-Hern (Velazquez), is and was a promoter of CryptoFX.
Velazquez controlled and induced or provided substantial assistance to CryptoFX within the
meaning of Corporations Code section 25403, subdivisions (a) and (b), in violating the above cited
laws.
6. CryptoFX, Aquino, and Velazquez represented to members of the public that
investors could expect a profit as a result of their crypto asset investment. Investor funds were
intermingled and investors had an expectation of profits derived from the success of CryptoFX’s
efforts.
7. Beginning in or about February 2022 and continuing until at least September 2022,
CryptoFX, Aquino, and Velazquez offered and sold securities to California residents in the form of
an investment contract called “Venture Agreement CryptoFX, LLC.” Aquino and Velazquez
collected cash investments ranging from $5,000 to $20,000. In return, investors received a copy of
their “Venture Agreement CryptoFX, LLC.”
8. Through general solicitations, in the form of telephone cold-calls, in-person meetings,
and an investor recruitment network, CryptoFX, Aquino, and Velazquez offered and sold securities
to investors and potential investors. Aquino and Velazquez used a multi-level marketing scheme that
would reward investors for inducing others to invest with CryptoFX.
9. CryptoFX, Aquino, and Velazquez held weekly meetings for prospective investors,
where existing investors shared their experiences receiving generous bonuses through CryptoFX’s
“referral program.” The “referral program” paid investors for recruiting new investors and the referral bonus received was a fixed percentage of the newly recruited investor’s investment. The
soliciting investors were listed as “sponsors” on each investment contract.
10. The Commissioner has jurisdiction over the offer and sale of securities in California
under the Corporate Securities Law of 1968 (Cal. Corp. Code §§ 25000-25707) (CSL).
11. The CryptoFX securities were offered and sold in this State in issuer transactions. The
Commissioner has not issued a permit or other form of qualification authorizing any person to offer
or sell these securities in this State.
12. In connection with the offer and sale of these securities, CryptoFX, Aquino, and
Velazquez made, or caused to be made, misrepresentations of material fact to investors and potential
investors, namely that investors would receive a return on their initial investment every three
months.
13. Investors have not received any return on their initial investment from CryptoFX,
Aquino or Velazquez. Despite multiple requests, investors also have not received their money back.
Based on the foregoing findings, the Commissioner is of the opinion that the securities
offered and sold in the form of investment contracts by CryptoFX LLC, also known as CryptoFX
Academy, CryptoFX Learning Academy, CFX Lifestyle Academy, CFX Academy, and CFX; by
Hector Aquino, also known as Hector Angeles Aquino Sr.; and by Claudia Velasquez, also known as
Claudia Hernandez Velazquez and Claudia Velazquez-Hern, are subject to qualification under the
CSL and have been or are being offered or sold without first being qualified in violation of
Corporations Code section 25110. Pursuant to Corporations Code section 25532, CryptoFX LLC,
also known as CryptoFX Academy, CryptoFX Learning Academy, CFX Lifestyle Academy, CFX
Academy, and CFX; Hector Aquino, also known as Hector Angeles Aquino Sr. and Claudia
Velasquez, also known as Claudia Hernandez Velazquez and Claudia Velazquez-Hern, are hereby
ordered to desist and refrain from the further offer and sale of securities in the State of California,
including but not limited to investment contracts, unless and until qualification has been made under
the law, or unless exempt.
In addition, the Commissioner is of the opinion that CryptoFX LLC, also known as
CryptoFX Academy, CryptoFX Learning Academy, CFX Lifestyle Academy, CFX Academy, and CFX; Hector Aquino, also known as Hector Angeles Aquino Sr.; and Claudia Velasquez, also
known as Claudia Hernandez Velazquez and Claudia Velazquez-Hern, offered or sold securities in
this State by means of written or oral communications which included an untrue statement of
material fact or which omitted to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, in violation of Corporations Code
section 25401. Pursuant to Corporations Code section 25532, CryptoFX LLC, also known as
CryptoFX Academy, CryptoFX Learning Academy, CFX Lifestyle Academy, CFX Academy, and
CFX; Hector Aquino, also known as Hector Angeles Aquino Sr.; and Claudia Velasquez, also
known as Claudia Hernandez Velazquez and Claudia Velazquez-Hern, are hereby ordered to desist
and refrain from offering or selling any security in the State of California, including but not limited
to investment contracts, by means of any written or oral communication which includes an untrue
statement of a material fact or which omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Pursuant to Corporations Code section 25401, any person who controls or induces another
person to violate a provision of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, or any person who provides
substantial assistance to another person in violation of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968 shall be
liable for the violations.
This Order is necessary, in the public interest, for the protection of consumers, and consistent
with the purposes, policies, and provisions of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968. This Order shall
remain in full force and effective until further order of the Commissioner.
At-a-glance
Related Categories
Business Details
- Location of This Business
- Houston, TX 77055
- BBB File Opened:
- 10/17/2022
Customer Complaints
1 Customer Complaints
Need to file a complaint? BBB is here to help. We'll guide you through the process. How BBB Processes Complaints and Reviews
File a ComplaintMost Recent Customer Complaint
10/24/2022
- Complaint Type:
- Billing Issues
- Status:
- Unanswered
BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.